Possibly use the following command to obtain the list of installed packages, that will make easier processing (that is will be done from the machine, and not manually). Thanks!
Code: Select all
pkg query -e '%a==0' '%o' > ~/pkg-list
Code: Select all
pkg query -e '%a==0' '%o' > ~/pkg-list
OK, please attach the file here.NevilleGoddard wrote:Found it. Thanks ASX.
Yes, thank you!NevilleGoddard wrote:To ASX
Is this OK? I'm pretty new to blogs.In fact this is my first one.
Short answer: Yes, that's possible.Jes wrote:Hi:
One question. Could it be possible to go on with the official FreeBSD repositories instead of GhostBSD's?. For example, if I want to upgrade to the next FreeBSD release and avoid depedency problems?
The base operating system and the third party packages are actually two independent things right now. If you're using vanilla FreeBSD you don't even need to have the package manager (pkg) installed if you want to do the base OS update! For GhostBSD this is of course not possible since we're providing a desktop and applications which come from packages. In the future FreeBSD will switch to what is called "packaged base" and provide the base system as packages, too. Currently however that's two different worlds. You can use freebsd-update and choose either repo afterwards to update your packages.Another question. I'm running currently 10.3. To upgrade to GhostBSD 11.0 when released the best option is using this GhostBSD repository? Or could I use the FreeBSD traditional way ( freebsd-update upgrade -r 11.0-RELEASE) ?
Definitely. You just risk losing GhostBSD specific modifications. This will most likely be unsupported and in case of problems you'll likely be on your own. But to be honest, I have no idea what direction it will take when we can apply our own port options. IMO we should be gentle and only make changes that really make sense. This might change in the future (nobody can say that right now) but as far as I know, GhostBSD has always aimed at remaining as close to FreeBSD as possible. It worked pretty well for a lot of people being "FreeBSD plus a nice GTK+ desktop". We certainly won't adopt the TrueOS way and make extremely invasive changes just because we can(tm). And if we do, so far the idea was to make those things optional (like replacing the init system or things like that).Third question. After upgrade GhostBSD 11.0 with GhostBSD package repository could I turn back to the FreeBSD repository?