Hi,
I have just made a post on freebsd forum, I hope something is wrong on my own systems, because if not so, any plan to make a semi-rolling release will be just failure because of upstream repo management.
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/pkgs ... 0-2.53214/
pkgs 10.1 vs.kgs 10.2
Re: pkgs 10.1 vs.kgs 10.2
well, this was solved quickly: there is a policy change between 10.1 to 10.2, to a "quarterly" repo.
I'm adding this thread for reference:
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/pkg- ... 0-2.52843/
I'm adding this thread for reference:
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/pkg- ... 0-2.52843/
Re: pkgs 10.1 vs.kgs 10.2
This is good we can make GhostBSD pkg more stable and in the same time have have a more edgy system.